Tuesday, March 31, 2009

BEST SELLER? DIDN'T EVEN *KNOW* HER!


ZEN WRAPPED IN KARMA DIPPED IN CHOCOLATE is number five this week in the San Francisco Chronicle's Best Seller list under "Quality Paperbacks." Wooooo-hoooooo!!

I guess maybe this touring thing is good for something. I'm at my sister's place in Knoxville, TN recuperating from the first leg of the tour and hoping I survive the next onslaught. The Deep South leg should be a little better because two of the major stops are 3-day Zen retreats, which are usually pretty chill and don't involve hauling ass from one place to another each day like I've been doing for the past two weeks.

A couple things, while I'm here. As I've said a bunch of times I basically no longer read the comments on this blog. On the rare occasions I do peek in it's clear that a lot of folks who post in there don't believe that. But it's true. I know there's some intelligent discussion going on. But the way some of the haters dominate the place just makes me lose interest very quickly.

Anyhow, I looked in there the other day and some guy was going on about how he used to think what I wrote was a breath of fresh air in the Zen world but now he's seen that what I write is just creating a mass of people who don't give a shit about anything. I'd just like to say that in my observation in traveling around the country meeting the people who've read my books, that is definitely not the case at all.

These are people who, to extend the metaphor of the guy who posted, deeply give a shit about everything. I am constantly amazed by the kind of people I'm meeting as I travel. These are not people whose attitude is "fuck everything I do what I want." They are profoundly committed to something greater than themselves.

Maybe they don't look the way we've been conditioned to believe Zen people should look and maybe they don't use the same vocabulary. Hell, I find some of the people who show up to my talks pretty scary myself! But that stuff is just superficial. There's something happening here and it's pretty amazing.

I can't take credit for this at all. Sometimes I wonder what these folks have been reading! It can't be the crap I write.

Anyway, back to the comments. I've found that the Internet is sometimes like a weird alternate universe that doesn't interact with the real world very much at all. I use the Internet, obviously. But I don't really participate in the bizarre artificial social stuff that goes on there a whole lot. People on the Internet don't act or respond like they do in the real world. When Tassajara caught fire and had to be evacuated some of the people who'd lived there started a blog so they could keep in contact. The comments section of that blog quickly turned nasty in ways that could never have happened in the actual physical community.

This is why I have very little interest in so-called "cyber-sanghas." They really are not in any way shape or form the same as real face-to-face communities. Even with the most up to date technology they don't work in the same way. I know it's tough for people who feel isolated from any kind of like-minded Buddhists. But I don't believe the Internet can ever be a substitute for real life personal interaction.

ANYWAY, while I was in DC, Shawn Cartwright, who hosted me there, gave me a copy of D.T. Suzuki's paperback "Zen Buddhism," published in 1956. I've never read much of D.T. Suzuki's writings. But I'm pleasantly surprised to see that most of it isn't too bad at all. He's a very good source for the historical stuff I've kind of neglected.

But the thing that bugs me is his insistence that Zen is illogical, or beyond mere logic. On page 19 of the paperback he gives an example. He quotes a conversation in which a monk asks Master Shin of Chosa, "Where has Nansen (an ancient Buddhist master) gone after his death?" Master Shin answers, "When Sekito was still in the order of young novitiates he saw the sixth patriarch." The monk says, "I didn't ask about the young novitiate. What I want to know is where Nansen went after his death." Master Shin replied, "As to that question, it makes one think."

Suzuki says about this, "What does 'it makes one think' explain? From this it is apparent that Zen is one thing and logic another. When we fail to make this distinction and expect Zen to give us something logically consistent and intellectually illuminating, we altogether misinterpret the signification of Zen."

Reading that I was just baffled. Because to me the conversation is perfectly logically consistent and even intellectually illuminating. The monk asks the master an abstract question and the master, not wanting to discuss abstractions, answers with a concrete fact. The monk persists and the master explains the true significance of the monk's question very clearly. It is the type of question that "makes one think." And that's all it does.

Speculation on what happens after people die simply makes you think. All anyone can do in response to such a question is indulge in abstractions and fantasies. This is what turned me away from religion a long time ago. I wanted to know the answer to what happened after people died and all I got was stories and fantasies. I found the Zen answer to be perfectly logical when it said that all you can ever get from such answers is a peek into someone else's world of fantasy. And I wasn't interested in other people's fantasies.

I don't really understand how anyone can miss this, especially a guy like D.T. Suzuki who otherwise seems to have a pretty good grasp of what's real and true.

Anyway, that's my little sermon on that for today.

Keep buying them books and sending them rocketing up the charts!

Check the list to your left <<<<< to see where I'll be next (Malaprop's in Asheville, NC as it turns out).

40 comments:

Mr. Reee said...

I know Brad won't read this but congrats on the SF rating. He should spend a bit more time around here if he can. There are lots of people who are deeply interested and many have already had a taste of Zen 1.0 (1960?-1985?) and are now ready for v2.

An iconoclastic attitude is welcome.

Harry said...

Dammit,

If you MUST be the one to get first comment then the least you could do is strut a bit.

Regards,

H.

Anonymous said...

If you are a southern barbarian, then
Welcome to The South!
Keep on strutting...

Mr. Reee said...

My apologies Harry. I would strut if I could, but I can't. I'm a beluga.

We can't do much of anything beside float, really.

:)

Brad's id said...

"As I've said a bunch of times I basically no longer read the comments on this blog. On the rare occasions I do peek in it's clear that a lot of folks who post in there don't believe that. But it's true."

You are hilarious, Master Bradley!

Anonymous said...

"You are hilarious, Master Bradley!"

What's the joke? Don't geddit, sorry.

He basically don't read the comments, cos he don't like the personal insults - but sometimes he does read the comments.

Makes sense to me.

Buddhist geek said...

I liked this post, Brad.

See what I did thar?

No name/No rank said...

I, for one, can feel the lurve :-)

Faceless said...

May I add my name to the list of, I hope, many thousands who also enjoyed this post.

Come on you Haters and Trolls, before it's too late! No slacking!

Buddhist geek said...

Erm.. I hate you all...

Forget it, I refuse to be a troll for the amusement of the masses anymore.

Im actually a nice bloke in real life. And so is Brad.

Thats all that matters.

Anonymous said...

See what happens! - Put a picture of yo bad self cuddlin a horsey on the cover and peace breaks out. LOL!

Yeah. Cool post.

Harry said...

Is that picture of Brad and the horse a prelude to some hardcore.......Zen?

Regards,

Harry.

Anonymous said...

"People on the Internet don't act or respond like they do in the real world."

What "real world"? Facebook? Twitter? lol

Errin said...

Your book tour would do a million times better if it came to Toronto :)

Peteshreds said...

Brad,
I just ordered your book on Amazon after I read a couple of pages when I was browsing at a borders in LA. I'm looking forward to reading the whole thing.

Keep it up!
-Pete

Jinzang said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
grisom said...

Your book tour would do a million times better if it came to Toronto :)

Or Edmonton! We have all the money! Pretty please?

Anonymous said...

As to the comments, it makes one wonder...

Weasel Tracks said...

Mr. Reee said...

. . . There are lots of people who are deeply interested and many have already had a taste of Zen 1.0 (1960?-1985?) and are now ready for v2.


I prefer Zen 0.0, which happens now and then, all along.

An iconoclastic attitude is welcome.

Then is it iconoclastic?

---Uncle Weasel, Christina Fundie

Mysterion said...

LOL

Chas

Lauren said...

Crisis! Turmoil! The only sangha I have is an e-sangha. The only substantial way I interact with other Buddhists is via blogs. This isl, apparently, not endorsed by Brad as effective. Crap! Now whaddu I do?

I'm sorry. I have to insist that that be a rhetorical question, since your replies would be tainted by blogginess. Please do not answer. AAAgghhh.

Chance said...

I believe that Buddha was known as the Perpetual Iconoclast, giving rise to the deconstruction of how we envision what surrounds. Zen questions the way we look at ourselves, the world and the truth of our perceived reality.
So yeah, I'd say an iconoclastic attitude is welcome.

Mr. Reee said...

Yes. Zen, at it's heart, is a meme destroying meme.

neilvw said...

speaking of zen 0.0...
Joshu Sasaki Roshi turns 102 today.

Alphonzen said...

LOLOLOLOLOL

Anonymous said...

let's face it Brad's comment was taking a shot at Jundo and Treeleaf. The battle wages on. I really think that he is trying to turn up the heat a little in his blog. draw out the trolls. stir up trouble. tease Jundo out. There has only been a low level simmer here for awhile.

Faceless said...

"let's face it Brad's comment was taking a shot at Jundo and Treeleaf."

Well, a reference to, maybe. An attempt to "stir up trouble"? I think not. Brad has said a lot worse about Jundo. In this case he was making a general point about interaction on the internet:

"People on the Internet don't act or respond like they do in the real world...This is why I have very little interest in so-called "cyber-sanghas." They really are not in any way shape or form the same as real face-to-face communities...I don't believe the Internet can ever be a substitute for real life personal interaction."

A fair enough point. You don't have to agree.

He also said, "I know it's tough for people who feel isolated from any kind of like-minded Buddhists."

Nothing personal. All very reasonable, I reckon.

Anonymous said...

I’m with Errin, Brad should come to Toronto.

outcastspice said...

yes, he should for sure come to Toronto! how else are we going to get snazzy tshirts?

jundo cohen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
jundo cohen said...

All like mind-to-minded folks who are looking for a little heart-to-heart human interaction are always welcome to sit-a-long at Treeleaf. ;-)

Gassho, Jundo

deranged hating troll said...

Thanks Jundo. But if we disagree with your views will you promise to call us deranged haters and mindless trolls like your brother monk?

jundo cohen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
jundo cohen said...

Not so long as you're civil while disagreeing, and commit to sit Shikantaza each day.

Anonymous said...

"Commit to sit Shikantaza each day..

Jundo, When Brad and you can see the best in each other instead of the worst, then I will recommit to sit Shikantaza each day. But it really seems like a waste of time.

jundo cohen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
jundo cohen said...

In this world, there appear to be separate selves, and they sometimes crash into each other and cause friction. Some attract, some repel. They see the best and worst in each other,

But from altered angle, there are no separate selves, never a crash, without friction. No best, no worst.

All true at once too!

That is Shikantaza.

Gassho, Jundo

PS - I like and respect Brad. I also disagree with him sometimes. Anyway, he's just me and me him.

Sanat said...

Awesome. I would never have understood the Nansen story without your explanation.

smallawei said...

蜂炮,情趣用品,情趣用品,視訊,免費視訊,煙火,煙火工廠,煙火,煙火,煙火,視訊,正妹視訊,真愛密碼,真愛密碼,衣蝶,衣蝶,情趣,情趣,AV女優,AV女優,煙火批發,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,小泉彩,小泉彩,情趣用品,鞭炮,live119論壇

sexy1689 said...

情趣,情趣用品
情趣,情趣用品
情趣,情趣用品
情趣,情趣用品
情趣,情趣用品

情趣,情趣用品

情趣,情趣用品

情趣,情趣用品
情趣,情趣用品

情趣,情趣用品

情趣,情趣用品

情趣,情趣用品

情趣,情趣用品
情趣,情趣用品
情趣,情趣用品